Turtles of the World
MENU
Turtles of the World
Chrysemys picta

Literature

  • Agassiz, L. 1857. Contributions to the natural history of the United States of America, vol. 1, 2. Little, Brown and Co., Boston. 452 pp.
  • Bishop, S. C., and F. J. W. Schmidt. 1931. The painted turtles of the genus Chrysemys. Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Natur. Hist. (293)18: 123-139.
  • Bleakney, S. 1958. Postglacial dispersal of the turtle Chrysemys picta. Herpetologica 14: 101-104.
  • Bull, J. J., and R. C. Vogt. 1979. Temperature-dependent sex determination in turtles. Science 206: 1186-1188.
  • Callard, I. P, V. Lance, A. R. Salanick, and D. Barad. 1978. The annual ovarian cycle of Chrysemys picta: correlated changes in plasma steroids and parameters of vitellogenesis. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 35: 245-257.
  • Callard, I. P., G. V. Callard, V. Lance, and S. Eccles. 1976. Seasonal changes in testicular structure and function and the effects of gonadotropins in the freshwater turtle, Chrysemys picta. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 30: 347-356.
  • Christens, E., and J. R. Bider. 1986. Reproductive ecology of the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta marginata) in southwestern Quebec. Can. J. Zool. 64: 914-920.
  • Christens, E., and J. R. Bider. 1987. Nesting activity and hatching success of the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta marginata) in southwestern Quebec. Herpetologica 43: 55-65.
  • Christiansen, J. L., and E. O. Moll. 1973. Latitudinal reproductive variation within a single subspecies of painted turtle, Chrysemys picta bellii. Herpetologica 29: 152-163.
  • Congdon, J. D., and D. W. Tinkle. 1982. Reproductive energetics of the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta). Herpetologica 38: 228-237.
  • Congdon, J. D., and J. W. Gibbons. 1987. Morphological constraint on egg size: a challenge to optimal egg size theory? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 84: 4145-4147.
  • DePari, J. A. 1996. Overwintering in the nest chamber by hatchling painted turtles, Chrysemys picta, in northern New Jersey. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 2: 5-12.
  • DeSmet, W. H. O. 1978. The chromosomes of 11 species of Chelonia (Reptilia). Acta Zool. Pathol. Antverp. 70: 15-34.
  • Ernst, C. H. 1967a. Intergradation between the painted turtles Chrysemys picta picta and Chrysemys picta dorsalis. Copeia 1967: 131-136.
  • Ernst, C. H. 1970a. The status of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta, in Tennessee and Kentucky. J. Herpetol. 4: 39-45.
  • Ernst, C. H. 1971a. Chrysemys picta. Catalog. Amer. Amphib. Rept. 106: 1-4.
  • Ernst, C. H. 1971b. Population dynamics and activity cycles of Chrysemys picta in southeastern Pennsylvania. J. Herpetol. 5: 151-160.
  • Ernst, C. H. 1971c. Observations of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. J. Herpetol. 5: 216-220.
  • Ernst, C. H. 1971d. Observations on the egg and hatchling of the American turtle, Chrysemys picta. British J. Herpetol. 4: 224-227.
  • Ernst, C. H., and B. S. McDonald Jr. 1989. Preliminary report on enhanced growth and early maturity in a Maryland population of painted turtles, Chrysemys picta. Maryland Herpetol. Soc. 25: 135-142.
  • Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 1971. The taxonomic status and zoogeography of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta, in Pennsylvania. Herpetologica 27: 390-396.
  • Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 1973. Biology of Chrysemys picta bellii in southwestern Minnesota. J. Minnesota Acad. Sci. 38: 77-80.
  • Ernst, C. H., and J. A. Fowler. 1977. Taxonomic status of the turtle, Chrysemys picta, in the northern peninsula of Michigan. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 90: 685-689.
  • Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1972. Turtles of the United States. Univ. Press Kentucky, Lexington. 347 pp.
  • Ganzhorn, D., and P. Licht. 1983. Regulation of seasonal gonadal cycles by temperature in the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Copeia.
  • Gibbons, J. W. 1968. Population structure and survivorship in the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Copeia.
  • Gist, D. H., J. A. Michaelson, and J. M. Jones. 1990. Autumn mating in the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Herpetologica 46: 331-336. .
  • Gray, J. E. 1831b. Synopsis Reptilium or short descriptions of the species of reptiles. Part 1. Cataphracta, tortoises, crocodiles, and enaliosaurians. London. 85 pp.
  • Groves, J. D. 1983. Taxonomic status and zoogeography of the painted turtle Chrysemys picta (Testudines: Emydidae), in Maryland. Amer. Midl. Natur. 109: 274-279.
  • Hartman, W. L. 1958. Intergradation between two subspecies of painted turtle, genus Chrysemys. Copeia.
  • Iverson, J. B., and G. R. Smith. 1993. Reproductive ecology of the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) in the Nebraska Sandhills and across its range. Copeia.
  • Johnson, R. M. 1954. The painted turtle, Chrysemys picta picta, in eastern Tennessee. Copeia.
  • Killebrew, F. 1977a. Mitotic chromosomes of turtles. IV. The Emydidae. Texas J. Sci. 29: 245-253.
  • Lefevre, K. A., and R. J. Brooks. 1995. Effects of sex and body size on basking behavior in a northern population of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Herpetologica 51: 217-224.
  • Licht, P., G. L. Breitenbach, and J. D. Congdon. 1985a. Seasonal cycles in testicular activity, gonadotropin, and thyrixine in the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta, under natural conditions. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 59: 130-139.
  • Licht, P., and D. A. Porter. 1985. In vivo and in vitro responses to gonadotropin releasing hormone in the turtle Chrysemys picta, in relation to sex and reproductive stage. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 60: 75-85.
  • Lindeman, P. V. 1991. Survivorship of overwintering hatchling painted turtles, Chrysemys picta, in northern Idaho. Northwest. Natur. 73: 27-30.
  • Lindeman, P. V. 1992. Nest-site fixity among painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) in northern Idaho. Northwest. Natur. 73: 27-30.
  • Lindeman, P. V. 1996a. Comparative life history of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) in two habitats in the inland Pacific Northwest. Copeia 1996: 114-130.
  • Lindeman, P. V. 1996b. Does life-history variation in the turtle Chrysemys picta have a subspecific component? J. Herpetol. 31: 155-161.
  • MacCulloch, R. D., and D. M. Secoy. 1983. Demography, growth, and food of western painted turtles, Chrysemys picta bellii (Gray), from southern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Zool. 61: 1499-1509.
  • Maurer, E. F. 1995. Chrysemys picta belli (western painted turtle). Feeding behavior. Herpetol. Rev. 26: 34.
  • McDowell, S. B. 1964. Partition of the genus Clemmys and related problems in the taxonomy of the aquatic Testudinidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 143: 239-279.
  • Mitchell, J. C. 1985a. Variation in the male reproductive cycle in a population of painted turtles, Chrysemys picta from Virginia. Herpetologica 41: 45-51.
  • Mitchell, J. C. 1985c. Female reproductive cycle and life history attributes in a Virginia population of painted turtles, Chrysemys picta. J. Herpetol. 19: 218-226.
  • Mitchell, J. C. 1988. Population ecology and life histories of the freshwater turtles Chrysemys picta and Sternotherus odoratus in an urban lake. Herpetol. Monogr. 2: 40-61.
  • Moll, E. O. 1973. Latitudinal and intersubspecific variation in reproduction of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Herpetologica 29: 307-318.
  • Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn Univ. Agric. Exp. Stat., Auburn, Alabama. 347 pp.
  • Parsons, T. S. 1968. Variation in the choanal structure of Recent turtles. Canadian J. Zool. 46: 1235-1263.
  • Pough, F. H., and M. B. Pough. 1968. The systematic status of painted turtles (Chrysemys) in the northeastern United States. Copeia.
  • Rhodin, A. G. J., and B. O. Butler. 1997. The painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) of New England: taxonomy, morphometrics, and reproduction. In: T. Tyning. (ed.), Status and conservation of turtles of the northeastern United States: a symposium, pp. 34-40. Serpent's Tale, Lanesboro, Minnesota.
  • Rhodin, A. G. J., and G. H. Mittelhauser. 1994. Maximum size and clutch size records for eastern painted turtles, Chrysemys picta picta, from mid-coastal Maine. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 1(2): 148-150.
  • Rowe, J. W. 1994. Egg size and shape variation within and among Nebraska painted turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii) populations: relationships to clutch and maternal body size. Copeia.
  • Rowe, J. W. 1995. Hatchling size in the turtle Chrysemys picta bellii from western Nebraska: relationships to egg and maternal body size. J. Herpetol. 29: 73-79.
  • Schneider, J. G. 1783. Allgemeine Naturgeschichte der Schildkröten, nebst einem System. Verseichnisse der einzelnen Arten. Leipzig. 364 pp.
  • Sexton, O. J. 1959. Spatial and temporal movements of a population of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta marginata (Agassiz). Ecol. Monogr. 29: 113-140.
  • Stock, A. D. 1972. Karyological relationships in turtles (Reptilia: Chelonia). Canadian J. Genet. Cytol. 14: 859-868.
  • Tinkle, D. W., J. D. Congdon, and P. C. Rosen. 1981. Nesting frequency and success: implications for the demography of painted turtles. Ecology 62: 1426-1432.
  • Tucker, J. K. 1978. Variation in reproductive potential and growth in Chrysemys picta within a single body of water. Bull. Maryland Herpetol. Soc. 14: 223-232.
  • Tucker, J. K., R. S. Funk, and G. L. Paukstis. 1978. The adaptive significance of egg morphology in two turtles (Chrysemys picta and Terrapene carolina). Bull. Maryland Herpetol. Soc. 14: 10-22.
  • Waters, J. H. 1964. Subspecific intergradation in the Nantucket Island, Massachusetts, population of the turtle Chrysemys picta. Copeia.
  • Waters, J. H. 1969. Additional observations of southeastern Massachusetts insular and mainland populations of painted turtles, Chrysemys picta. Copeia.
  • Weaver, W. G., Jr., and F. L. Rose. 1967. Systematics, fossil history, and evolution of the genus Chrysemys. Tulane Stud. Zool. 14: 63-73.
  • Whillans, T. H., and E. J. Crossman. 1977. Morphological parameters and spring activities in a central Ontario population of midland painted turtle, Chrysemys picta marginata (Agassiz). Can. Field-Natur. 91: 47-57.
  • Zug, G. R. 1966. The penial morphology and the relationships of cryptodiran turtles. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan (647): 1-24.

%LABEL% (%SOURCE%)